Trump’s Trade War: America’s Bully-in-Chief Wants His Cut
Trump’s back, and so is his favourite economic weapon.
Donald Trump doesn’t negotiate, he demands tribute.
For him, global trade isn’t about economics, it’s about dominance. The U.S. isn’t just a player in the global economy; it’s the muscle, and Trump has made it his job to make sure everyone pays up. Tariffs aren’t just an economic tool, they’re a power move. A pressure tactic, a way to turn up the heat on foreign competitors.
Back in the White House for his second term, Trump has made one thing clear: Round one was just warm-up.
The Trump Doctrine: Pay Up or Get Crushed
Look around the world and you’ll realize that most politicians treat global trade like a game of chess. Trump isn’t playing chess. He’s banging on the door demanding payment, plus interest. Either pay what he thinks you owe, or face the consequences.
A 25% tariff on all imports from Mexico and Canada, because even America’s neighbours aren’t safe.
A 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, adding fuel to an already raging fire.
Possible tariff penalties on any country running a trade surplus with the U.S., because in Trump’s world, if the U.S. is “losing”, someone else must be cheating.
This isn’t economic policy, it’s a global power move.
Trump doesn’t view world leaders as partners; he sees them as opponents. The strategy? Classic bully behaviour:
Make an aggressive first move. Hit them hard with tariffs, just to remind them who’s in charge.
Force them to cough up “fairer” trade deals. In Trump terms, anything that makes America look like the undisputed winner.
Publicly humiliate your opponents. It’s not enough to just make other countries pay, Trump wants them to admit they got outplayed.
The Cost of “Winning”
His pitch to justify his actions is that American tariffs punish foreign nations and bring jobs back home, a practice commonly known as reshoring. Unlucky for Trump, we’ve seen this play out before. Here’s what to expect:
China won't fold. They’ll hit back with retaliatory tariffs on U.S. farmers, manufacturers, and tech companies as they did before. Beijing has already warned it’s ready to fight “any type” of war. If Trump wants a rematch, China’s not backing down.
Businesses won’t absorb costs. They’ll pass them on. Tariffs are simply taxes with extra steps, and who’s footing the bill? You. In all wars, there’s collateral damage, and consumers are going to be the victims in Trump’s latest trade war.
Markets will go into chaos. Wall Street hates uncertainty, companies will rethink expansion, and the global economy? It’s about to get rough.
So Trump can slap a tariff on anything and everything he wants, but don’t be shocked when you’re paying more for cars, electronics, and just about anything imported.
Trump’s Favourite Weapon: The Fear Factor
The thing about Trump? He doesn’t even need to follow through on all of this to shake the world. Just the threat of tariffs is enough to make CEOs hedge their bets, force foreign leaders into awkward negotiations, and keep everyone guessing. Exactly how Trump likes it.
Some politicians build alliances. Trump builds leverage. Deals? No, ultimatums.
Will It Work?
Depends on what you mean by “work.”
If the objective is making foreign companies nervous and keeping American trade partners on their toes? Trump doesn’t just play, he sets the rules.
But if the goal is long-term stability, lower prices, and a predictable economy? This is using a hammer where a scalpel is needed.
Either way, Trump’s tariffs and trade war are back. And this time, he’s not just playing tough with China – he’s coming for everyone, starting with Canada and Mexico in his own backyard.
In his eyes, the US has long been too soft, too nice, and too willing to “lose.” So Trump’s bringing back his favourite weapon. The one that sends stocks tumbling, makes foreign leaders sweat, and Trump voters cheer.
The only question? How much damage is he willing to take to prove a point?
Hey Sean,
Really enjoyed this piece—your breakdown of Trump’s trade policies is sharp, and I appreciate how you tie in both the historical and economic context. You make a strong case for how the aggressive tariff approach hurt more than it helped, and the way you unpack the ripple effects is super compelling.
That said, I see it a little differently. While the tariffs were messy and definitely came with short-term pain, they also forced some much-needed conversations about trade imbalances, intellectual property theft, and the risks of overreliance on foreign manufacturing—especially with China. Some industries actually benefited from the push to bring production back home, and while the execution wasn’t perfect, the broader goal of strengthening U.S. industries had its merits.
Curious—do you see any long-term positives that came out of this, or do you think it was all downside?